The Demographics of National Representation

“One man, one vote” is the slogan – but is that always the reality?  In 1783, at the end of the Revolutionary War, voting was limited to property-holding, white men, 21 or over.  So reasonable reductions based on those restrictions could be:
  • 50% due to gender
  • 25%+ due to race (African Americans and Native Americans)
  • 50% due to age (life expectancy was about 40)
  • 25%+ due to property requirement (privileged, but some white men were poor)
So, in the best-case scenario, maybe 1 in 7 could vote; even then, participation was not 100%. Suffrage is more broadly enjoyed today. Still, there remain built-in inequities and structural hurdles to voting.

The Electoral College Structurally Imbalances Voting

The Electoral College, like much of the Constitution, was a compromise between the States, then grouped, broadly, as slaveholding and non-slaveholding.   On the national level, the number of Senators is based on statehood while the number of Congressman is based on the state population, tallied every ten years via the census.  Today, on average, there is one Representative for every 784,000 inhabitants of the United States.

But the ratio of population per Representative ranges from one per half-million (West Virginia, 561K) to one per million (Hawaii, 1.011MM). The ratio per Senator ranges from one per 295K inhabitants in the least populous state, Wyoming, to one per 19.8 million in the most populous state, California. The District of Columbia has no Senators, but its Electoral College weight of one per 240K inhabitants is the highest ratio in the nation.

Self Agreement

When 16% Approaches the Majority

The smallest 26 states constitute 18% of the population (55 out of 344 million) but nevertheless could control the Senate (52 out of 100 elected members).  In the table below, that includes the states from Wyoming to Kentucky.

  • Other ways that voting is suppressed:
  • Prohibit convicted felons from voting, even after their sentence has been served
  • Make registration difficult
  • Partisan purges of voters’ rolls
  • Restricting hours of voting sites
  • Understaffing voting sites, typically in poorer and browner districts
  • Gerrymandering

Rich donors, organizations, and lobbyists have access to politicians or concentrated voting blocks that restrict the Overton Window for candidates in ways that are decidedly anti-democratic.

Least Populous 25 States

State Electoral College Population Pop/Sen Pop/Rep
Wyoming 3 590,169 295,085 590,169
Vermont 3 648,278 324,139 648,278
North Dakota 3 804,089 402,045 804,089
Delaware 3 931,033 465,517 931,033
South Dakota 3 931,033 465,517 931,033
Alaska 3 1,067,410 533,705 1,067,410
West Virginia 4 1,121,190 560,595 560,595
Rhode Island 4 1,143,160 571,580 571,580
New Hampshire 4 1,410,380 705,190 705,190
Montana 4 1,415,860 707,930 707,930
Maine 4 1,450,900 725,450 725,450
Idaho 4 1,769,460 884,730 884,730
Hawaii 4 2,023,070 1,011,535 1,011,535
New Mexico 5 2,032,120 1,016,060 677,373
Nebraska 5 2,139,350 1,069,675 713,117
Utah 6 2,942,920 1,471,460 735,730
Nevada 6 2,989,710 1,494,855 747,428
Mississippi 6 3,107,240 1,553,620 776,810
Kansas 6 3,264,560 1,632,280 816,140
Iowa 6 3,320,570 1,660,285 830,143
Arkansas 6 3,564,000 1,782,000 891,000
Oklahoma 7 3,707,120 1,853,560 741,424
Connecticut 7 4,126,900 2,063,450 825,380
Oregon 8 4,291,090 2,145,545 715,182
Louisiana 8 4,607,410 2,303,705 767,902
Total 122 55,399,022 1,107,980.4 769,430.9
Senators/Representative 50 72
         
The District of Columbia 3 720,250 240,083

Most Populous 25 States

State Electoral College Population Pop/Sen Pop/Rep
Kentucky 8 4,626,150 2,313,075 771,025
South Carolina 9 5,197,720 2,598,860 742,531
Alabama 9 5,569,830 2,784,915 795,690
Wisconsin 10 5,833,250 2,916,625 729,156
Missouri 10 5,991,540 2,995,770 748,943
Minnesota 10 6,013,650 3,006,825 751,706
Maryland 10 6,282,890 3,141,445 785,361
Colorado 10 6,309,380 3,154,690 788,673
Tennessee 11 6,968,420 3,484,210 774,269
Massachusetts 11 7,205,770 3,602,885 800,641
Indiana 11 7,307,200 3,653,600 811,911
Arizona 11 7,691,740 3,845,870 854,638
Washington 12 8,059,040 4,029,520 805,904
Virginia 13 8,887,700 4,443,850 807,973
New Jersey 14 9,622,060 4,811,030 801,838
Michigan 15 10,197,600 5,098,800 784,431
North Carolina 16 11,210,900 5,605,450 800,779
Georgia 16 11,297,300 5,648,650 806,950
Ohio 17 11,942,600 5,971,300 796,173
Pennsylvania 19 12,778,100 6,389,050 751,653
Illinois 19 13,139,800 6,569,900 772,929
New York 28 19,997,100 9,998,550 769,119
Florida 30 23,839,600 11,919,800 851,414
Texas 40 31,853,800 15,926,900 838,258
California 54 39,663,800 19,831,900 762,765
Total 413 287,486,940 5.749,738.8 791,975.0
Senators/Representative     50 363
         
All 50 States 535 342,885,962 3,428,859.6 788,243.6

The last line in the table above shows that the smallest 25 states have 50 Senators and 72 Congressmen. Their 16% share of population correlates to their 16% control in the House of Representatives; but their 50 Senators add up to 50% of the Senate thereby overrepresenting them in the upper chamber as well as in the Electoral College. 

Swing to Marginalization and Other Voting Ideas

Worse still, for many Presidential elections, the key to victory resides in the five to ten “swing states”. While the collection of competitive states vacillates over time, in the Presidential elections of 2016, 2020 and 2024, these eight states were pivotal:

Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Florida, Arizona, Nevada, Georgia, and North Carolina.

Voter participation rate ranges from about 45% to 60% during Presidential cycles and closer to 35% in off-cycle years. The efforts to increase participation include voting by mail or automatic registration while acquiring, say, a driver’s license.

There have been elitist theories that posit only educated voters should be allowed to vote. In a more egalitarian setting, how to achieve the goal of increased participation?

Countries like Austria, Spain and France provide paid days off to vote. There are 22 countries where voting is mandatory, including Australia where failure to vote incurs a $20 fine. Electronic voting through, say, the equivalent of an ATM has been discussed, but there are concerns of hacking and a lack of a paper trail.

While voter fraud is often invoked in the United States, studies conclude that the incidence of such fraud is miniscule. For example, in Pennsylvania, during the past three decades, only 39 cases of fraud were discovered out of 100 million votes.

Even in Presidential elections, participation hovers at one in two. Historically, fraud is less than one in a million. In other words, a 50% increase in voter participation would result in 3 out of 4 voting while a 50% increase in fraud would be 78 out of 100 million or still less than one per million. Notwithstanding fraud, actual representation would improve. No system is perfect, but improving participation would appear to far outweigh potential fraud. It would be a worthwhile tradeoff to incur more Type 2 errors while significantly reducing the incidences of Type 1 errors.